Skip to main content

Home Cooking – Funny families on “Fresh Off the Boat” and “Black-ish.”

3/9/2015   The New Yorker  By

Like many pioneering TV series, ABC’s “Fresh Off the Boat,” a sitcom about a Taiwanese-American family running a Western-themed chophouse in Orlando, Florida, débuted to impossibly high expectations, hand-wringing, and prickly waves of preëmptive backlash. In an unusual twist, this hazing came from the man whose life the show was based on.

If “Fresh Off the Boat” emphasizes family warmth, it’s complicated by sharp details.

In an essay in New York, Eddie Huang, the celebrity chef, Vice TV host, and author of the memoir “Fresh Off the Boat,” merrily trash-talked his own collaborators, including a Chinese-American producer, whom he called an “Uncle Chan,” and the showrunner, Nahnatchka Khan, an Iranian-American. “What did you buy my book for?” Huang yelled, frustrated that the show had bowdlerized his story, which included whippings by his father, an immigrant restaurant owner. “Just make A Chinks Life . . . With Free Wonton Soup or Soda.” Thousands of words in, Huang tossed out a few lines of praise, but the impression he left wasn’t great—if he saw his sitcom as a sellout, who were viewers to disagree?

At the heart of this rant was the question of what makes TV bold: Huang wanted something pungent, like an FX anti-hero dramedy, or like the nineties sitcom “Married with Children,” the type of show that would underline (and maybe glamorize) his violent youth, his charismatic dick of a dad, and the roots of Huang’s own flamboyant persona. That desire wasn’t sheerly egotistical: Huang was eager to push back at the cliché of Asian men as passive, genitally cheated nerds (“the eunuch who can count,” as he puts it in the book)—a Long Duk Dong stereotype still visible on shows like CBS’s “2 Broke Girls.” Huang wanted “Fresh Off the Boat” to “go hard,” like his nineties hip-hop heroes. In the process, he was claiming TV’s own bad-boy role, the provocateur who shoves authenticity down the throat of The Man. Think Roseanne; think Louis C.K. and Dave Chappelle.

In reality, of course, the bad-boy provocateur very rarely gets final cut on a network family sitcom—it’s a genre more prone to compromise than a Senate bill. Even the edgiest shows have limits: Al Bundy never hit Peggy, after all. So it’s no surprise that, aesthetically, “Fresh Off the Boat” fits right into ABC’s sweet-tempered slate of comedies, which includes the subtly retrograde “Modern Family,” the wonderful “The Middle,” “The Goldbergs,” “Black-ish”—a smart new show that I’ll get to in a moment—and the unfortunately bland “Cristela.” Like all these shows, “Fresh Off the Boat” is brightly lit, with an A plot and a B plot. The jokes aren’t dirty and nobody gets his butt whipped. The parents—patriotic restaurant-manager dad, Louis (Randall Park), and proudly alienated mom, Jessica (the terrific Constance Wu)—love one another. There’s even a “Wonder Years”-esque voice-over, performed by Huang, and an ensemble of adorable children. It’s a comedy the whole family can watch together—which may be either an insult or a compliment, but is definitely a business plan.

Yet, even in its half-dozen early episodes, those burnt first pancakes of sitcoms, the show has a radical quality, simply because it arrives in a television landscape with few Asian characters, almost none of them protagonists. Khan, the showrunner (who wrote for Seth MacFarlane, and who produced the wicked ABC sitcom “Don’t Trust the B—— in Apartment 23”), is her own sort of provocateur, an expert at slipping rude ideas into polite formats. She uses the Asian-American family to reset TV’s defaults. The characters aren’t the hero’s best friends; they’re not macho cartoons or eye candy, either, as on some cable dramas I could name. This can be an unpleasantly clinical way to talk: it places the critic in the camp of the bean counters, not the gonzo rapscallions. But simply watching people of color having a private conversation, one that’s not primarily about white people, is a huge deal. It changes who the joke is on. “Fresh Off the Boat” is part of a larger movement within television, on shows that include the CW’s “Jane the Virgin” and Fox’s “Empire”—a trend that’s most influential when it creates a hit, not a niche phenomenon.

Reading the book, then watching the show, you get why Huang was frustrated: without a cruel bully for a father, Eddie’s taste for hip-hop feels more superficial—in the book, it’s an abused kid’s catharsis and an identification with black history. But, if the show emphasizes family warmth, that theme is complicated by sharp sociological details: the only black kid in the school calls Eddie a “Chink” and smirks at his hip-hop T-shirt; Jessica grabs every free sample at the supermarket, then gives the employee a hilariously dismissive wave; Louis hires a white host to attract customers (“A nice happy white face, like Bill Pullman,” he explains firmly). There’s no violence, but there are specific immigrant perspectives, shown through multiple lenses.

In one of Khan’s most effective gambits, we see Eddie through his mother’s eyes as often as we see her through his. In the book, Jessica is a brazen, mysterious goad to her son; on the show, she’s a full character, Eddie’s equal in cultural alienation, even if her escape is Stephen King, not the Notorious B.I.G. In one of the most interesting early episodes, mother and son are both drawn to Honey, a trophy wife who lives next door. Eddie sees a hot MILF he can show off to the boys; Jessica sees a kindred spirit who will eat her “stinky tofu” and bond over “Dolores Claiborne”—then pulls away when she realizes that Honey is the town home-wrecker. The show hits every awkward angle of this triangle, including a surreal fantasy sequence in which Eddie, inspired by his hero Ol’ Dirty Bastard, sprays Capri Sun on gyrating video vixens. (His mom intrudes, complaining that he’s wasting juice, while his father offers the women free samples from the restaurant: “Come on, Fly Girls. Try a rib! Tell a friend.”)

In the final scene, at a block party, everyone’s loneliness collides, as Eddie gropes Honey, and Jessica sees her neighbor’s humiliation. Opening her heart to a fellow-outsider, Jessica seizes the karaoke mike to serenade Honey with an awkward, earnest rendition of “I Will Always Love You.” The sequence doesn’t “go hard”; it goes soft, quite deliberately. But somehow it still manages to find strangeness within its sentimentality. “Fresh Off the Boat” is unlikely to dismantle the master’s house. But it opens a door.

ABC’s other new family sitcom, “Black-ish,” created by Kenya Barris and Larry Wilmore (who left to do “The Nightly Show,” on Comedy Central), has had fifteen episodes, giving it more of a chance to grow than “Fresh Off the Boat”—and in that time the series has transformed from hokey formula into one of the goofiest, most reliably enjoyable comedies around. Early on, the show kept aggressively re-stating its thesis: Andre (Dre), a successful adman, is worried that his four kids aren’t black enough. Growing up rich in a white suburb, they don’t remember a time before Obama; Andre Junior is a nerd, not a thug. Andre’s biracial wife, Rainbow, an anesthesiologist, is less concerned about race. Each week, Dre tries to toughen the kids up, terrified that if they don’t get “blacker” he’ll have failed as a father.

The problem with the show, initially, was that Andre himself felt so off-putting—childlike and abrasive, a man-baby in the Homer Simpson mode—that it was hard to buy his marriage or his success, let alone his lessons. Rainbow, played by the fantastic Tracee Ellis Ross, was trapped in the gruesome role of wife-as-mommy, the sighing goody-goody. It’s hard to even remember that version, though, because, once “Black-ish” settled in, it began, like so many smart sitcoms, a quiet reinvention. Andre got more insightful; Rainbow became a glamorous dork with a temper and her own loose-limbed charisma; the kids clicked, too; and Andre’s workplace became a reliably hilarious setting for him to brainstorm about his troubles. It helped that he began to acknowledge his own outsized personality, too, rather than presenting it as interchangeable with authentic urban blackness. “I’m a lot,” Andre says, about his parenting. “If they can get past me, they can get past anything.”

A funny Valentine’s Day episode featured a date night that went downhill—a sitcom chestnut that paid off, miraculously, owing to sharp dialogue and the couple’s great chemistry. Andre and Rainbow sniped over his mispronouncing the word as “Valentimes.” They revisited a childbirth scenario so awkward that the doctor asked her, “You mean he’s actually part of your life? Because plenty of women successfully raise children alone.” They argued over whether or not Andre saw Gene Hackman at a roller rink. (“You think everyone is Gene Hackman!” Rainbow fumes.) In the best tradition of the mainstream sitcom, the show felt both new and familiar, giving the show’s marriage emotional roots.

As these relationships became more organic, “Black-ish” also got looser with its ethnic humor, with plots about Andre competing to be a black Santa Claus (he loses out to a Mexican woman) and microaggressions on a baseball field. When Rainbow notices a gray pubic hair, Andre tells her, “You look distinguished, going all Frederick Douglass down there.” When their daughter dates a French boy, a co-worker of Andre’s says, “I cheated on my husband with a French-Canadian. His Frenchness was so powerful that I forgot he was Canadian.” Andre’s mother tells Rainbow, “You are too hard on the kids. If I didn’t know you were mixed, I’d swear you were Chinese.”

In the show’s most outrageous episode, a ski trip becomes an outlandish parody of Martin Luther King Day. Rainbow throws sardonic air quotes onto “Doctor,” because King had no medical degree; Andre Junior admits that he’s never fully absorbed King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, because “I always kind of zone out when people start to tell me about their dreams.” The jokes overlapped, turning flippant, wild, verging on misfire—an elbow in the ribs of boomer earnestness. In a safe sitcom structure, it was a different kind of risk: inside jokes in an outside voice. 

 

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/03/09/home-cooking-television-emily-nussbaum

PopPolitics: How ‘Madam Secretary’ Became an Antidote to Dark D.C. Dramas (Listen)

2/282/2015   Variety   by

Madam Secretary,” which returns on Sunday on CBS after a brief hiatus, has made a mark for what it isn’t — a tick-tock thriller or dark serialized drama that is part of the current wave of D.C.-set shows.

The show stars Tea Leoni as a CIA analyst who is unexpectedly nominated to the top role at the State Department.

Executive producers Barbara Hall and Lori McCreary tell Variety‘s “PopPolitics” on SiriusXM that the show avoids polarization — even though it has featured very-close-to-reality storylines about negotiations over Iran’s nuclear capabilities and the standoff over the Texas border with Mexico.

“Certainly there is an aspirational aspect to the show that this is the way we would like to think the way things could be resolved, because we do want to stay within the realm of reality and we do want to invite people into the process,” Hall says.

“We have to be very careful so we have an actual calculus for that,” she adds. “We are saying the story is about one election cycle in the future, maybe four or five years, something like that. So we are writing about current events, but it is a little bit of a projection.”

The writers do generate ideas from the headlines. Hall says that when she first heard about the controversy surrounding Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech before Congress, she thought, “We should do that.”

The show, one of this season’s biggest new successes, already has been renewed for next year.

“I wanted to create a discussion about politics that didn’t have to be so polarized and polarizing,” Hall says. “So it is actually our mission not go there, and not to present platforms and positions and campaigns.”

Listen below:

McCreary and Hall talk about how the show has to be careful in its depiction of real-life countries, with movies like “The Interview” sparking international incidents from North Korea and “Homeland” drawing objections from Pakistan. “I think we feel more responsibility than pressure,” Hall says.

Listen below:

McCreary says the “spark of a tiny idea” for the show came from Hillary Clinton’s 2012 testimony over the attacks in Benghazi, but Hall created an original premise that diverged from Clinton’s tenure and background. It focuses extensively on the relationship between Secretary of State Elizabeth McCord, her husband Henry (Tim Daly) and her children.

Hall believes that they are past the initial media questions of whether the show is in anyway based on Clinton, but it remains to be seen if it will come up again if Clinton runs for president in 2016.

Listen below:

Harold Ford Jr., honorary co-chair of the industry group Broadband for America, warns that the FCC’s net neutrality action will have a “chilling effect on the ecosystem.”

Listen below:

Comedian Chris Bliss talks about the Let Freedom Laugh concert in Washington on Saturday, with Lewis Black headlining a benefit for Bliss’ campaign to install monuments to the Bill of Rights at statehouses in all 50 states.

Listen below:

“PopPolitics,” hosted by Ted Johnson, airs Thursdays at 2 p.m. ET on SiriusXM’s POTUS Channel 124.

 

http://variety.com/2015/tv/news/madam-secretary-antidote-to-dark-dc-dramas-1201443922/

Ricky Martin Joins Univision Music Competition Show as Judge

2/19/2015   THR   by Alex Ben Block

Ricky Martin is joining Simon Cowell‘s new Spanish language music competition show on Univision, La Banda, as a judge and executive producer.

Martin is the first judge to be announced on the show, which is set to premiere in September. It will seek to find the “ultimate Latino boyband through the largest talent search in U.S. Hispanic history,” according to the announcement.

The reality competition was developed for the largest Spanish language TV network in the U.S. by Cowell’s SYCO Entertainment and Haim Sabans‘ Saban Brands. It is being co-produced with Fremantle Media Latin America.

Cowell’s credits include being a judge on American Idol and a judge and producer of X Factor.

Martin’s latest studio album, A Quien Quiera Escuchar (“To anyone who wants to listen”) was released Feb. 10 and debuted at No. 1 on the U.S. and Puerto Rican music charts.

“Our community needs musical projects in order to cultivate its talents,” said Martin, “which is why I feel it’s the perfect moment for a show like La Banda. There is so much talent to be discovered, and I’m sure we’ll find the next musical phenomenon with the help of not only the judges but also the fans.”

“Ricky’s vast talents as a singer, actor and producer will greatly enhance our phenomenal production already underway,” said Alberto Ciurana, president, programming and content, Univision Communications.

The show will seek out talented Latino male singers and put them together in bands. The winner will be a recording contract with Sony Music Latin. Boys 14 and older living in the U.S. and Puerto Rico can enter.

The producers, along with Cowell, include Kelly Belldegrun, executive producer for SYCO Entertainment; Nigel Hall, executive producer for SYCO Entertainment; Gert Verpeet, executive producer for FremantleMedia Latin America; Treicy Benavides, executive producer for FremantleMedia Latin America and Cisco Suarez, executive producer for Univision Communications.

 

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ricky-martin-joining-univision-music-775566?mobile_redirect=false

The cost to produce original TV shows is skyrocketing

Business Insider   2/22/2015   Sophie Estienne, AFP

New York (AFP) – In the new age of American television, it pays to be original. But it also costs a bundle.

The cast of “Game Of Thrones” attend a Q&A during Comic-Con International 2014 on July 25, 2014, in San Diego, California

From Time Warner and its HBO unit to streaming video group Netflix and online giant Amazon, money is pouring in to produce new shows like “Game of Thrones,” “Transparent” and “Marco Polo.”

With TV viewing habits becoming fragmented as more people go online for new outlets, the pressure is on to attract audiences with fresh, original programs.

Netflix is planning to spend $3 billion on content this year as it pushes to grow globally, expanding its offerings after successes with the political drama “House of Cards” and comedy-drama “Orange is The New Black.”

Not to be outdone, Amazon has stepped up its original production efforts with the transgender series “Transparent,” winner of a Golden Globe, and others, with famed director Woody Allen hired by the online giant.

Amazon invested some $1.3 billion in television programming last year, according to founder Jeff Bezos.

“Working with Woody Allen is not cheap,” said James McQuivey, an analyst at Forrester Research who follows disruptive technologies.

McQuivey said more studios and outlets are bidding for these programs, pushing up costs.

“Suddenly, instead of only having four or five studios to sell your TV shows to, you now have 12 or 16, and some of them are very motivated because they’re looking for the next big hit,” he said.

According to Nielsen data compiled by the FX cable channel, there are 352 original scripted dramas and comedies produced for US cable, broadcast and online television this year.

The number of original cable programs has doubled in the past five years. For online, the sector has grown from non-existent to 24 original programs, the research showed. That includes new efforts from Internet players such as Yahoo, AOL and Hulu.

Cable giants strike back

Traditional cable and broadcast operators are not sitting still. Time Warner spent $14.5 billion on HBO programming, production and marketing in 2014, and chief executive Jeff Bewkes sees that figure growing to $19 billion in the next few years.

Viacom — which owns Nickelodeon, MTV and Comedy Central — said programming costs were up 15 percent in the past quarter.

At 21st Century Fox, controlled by mogul Rupert Murdoch, investment is a priority as well, with the broadcast Fox network having rolled out new blockbusters like “Gotham” and “Empire.”

“The next year will be a period of investments with priority focused on building hit shows, not maximizing profits. The profits will follow,” said president and chief operating officer Chase Carey.

“Our competitors have already shown what difference a couple of hits can make.”

Looking for hits

AMC hit “Mad Men”

These TV operators are looking for the next hit in the manner of HBO’s “Sopranos,” or the AMC programs “Mad Men” and “Breaking Bad.”

James Murdoch, the co-chief operating officer at 21st Century Fox, said finding the next big success is not easy.

“There’s just an absolutely enormous amount of original production going on right now,” he said.

“The total volume isn’t really the question. The right question is what are you making? How do you make it great? How do you stand out? And can you be a place that can attract the great show runners, the great writers, the great talent to come and do incredible work?”

It’s not clear if the television companies can maintain the pace of investment, or whether consumers will turn away when faced with higher subscription costs.

McQuivey said there is now “an oversupply of funding” because the old model companies are still flush with cash from their more profitable years.

“That’s a very temporary phase,” he said, noting that companies will have to tighten up as profits are squeezed.

“You can no longer start 20 new series knowing that each of these series is going generate half as many viewers as they used to,” McQuivey added.

“For now, people are making their last bets because they know the time is coming when some of them are going to be gone. They don’t want to be the ones that don’t make it across that transition.”

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/afp-american-tv-outlets-want-original-as-costs-skyrocket-2015-2#ixzz3SgeJvfOF

Pizza, Sleepovers, and Parental Sex Talks on Fresh Off The Boat

Slate   2/20/2015   By Jennifer Lai and Phil Yu

Constance Wu and Randall Park.

It’s been a full two decades since prime-time television has seen an Asian American family sitcom. But ABC’s new show Fresh Off the Boat, loosely based on celebrity chef Eddie Huang’s memoir, is changing that. Though the very first Asian American family sitcom, Margaret Cho’s All-American Girl, was canceled due to poor ratings and lack of interest back in 1995, Fresh Off the Boat has already stirred up considerable buzz. It’s also a significant moment for many Asian Americans, who have largely been excluded or misrepresented when it comes to the mainstream.

But testing the waters won’t be easy for Fresh Off the Boat. Will the show resonate with a non-Asian audience? Will it manage to undermine stereotypes or end up reinforcing them? Will its jokes be lame?

So we wanted to discuss the series from an Asian American point of view. This week, Slate’s Jennifer Lai will be joined by Phil Yu, creator of the blog Angry Asian Man, along with Asian American female rapper and comedian Awkwafina.

Jennifer Lai: I was so impressed (and shocked!) that this week’s sex talk scene directly came from Huang’s memoir. In this scene, Louis explains to Eddie that the best thing about America is that you can have lots of premarital sex, unlike in Taiwan, where the girls are too conservative. In the memoir, it’s obviously a lot more vulgar—Eddie’s father actually uses the term “sports fucking” to explain how girls in America are willing to have sex for “fun” or “just practice”—but the idea is basically the same.

Phil Yu: That scene certainly busts some stereotypes, and draws a huge difference between the Huang family and my family (and many of my Asian friends’ families too). My parents NEVER talked about it. I cannot even imagine what “the sex talk” with my Korean American dad would look or sound like.

Awkwafina: With a primetime show, there are definitely limits on what we can talk about, especially pertaining to some true but kind-of uncomfortable aspects of growing up in an Asian household. But being sexual is not so much an aspect of growing-up Asian as being slapped with a backscratcher when you’re caught smoking Marlboro menthol lights is.

Lai: It was all pretty unrealistic and ridiculous—what Asian parent, let alone any parent, would approach the sex talk with their 12-year-old son that way? (“Don’t go to Arkansas, they outlawed all the fun stuff.”) But it all just goes back to what Constance Wu has said before—that she doesn’t have to represent every Asian mom ever, and that she shouldn’t have to. While that exchange might be unbelievable to most of us, that conversation actually really happened to Eddie Huang IRL!

Awkwafina: That scene was done strictly for the humor and less for the relatability. I did have the sex talk with my father, and he did tell me to “use a bag” and it was literally the most horrifying moment of my entire life. But this talk didn’t happen until I was 16.

Lai: What did it mean for you guys to see an Asian American dad talking to his son about sex like this?

Yu: This scene is pretty radical. Asian males have a long, storied history of being de-sexualized on screen. We are perceived as not sexy, not having sex, not being sexual, and being clueless about sex. Even coming from Louis, who, up this point in the series, has mostly been the goofy dad character, it’s just refreshing to see an Asian male figure (who has clearly had sex) just trying to have a frank talk about it, as awkward as it plays out. It was also funny and awkward to see little Eddie, the Asian kid, be part of the age-old, time-honored quest to understand sex… and track down porn.

Awkwafina: Eddie is definitely that quintessential kind of horny little kid, and it’s cool to see that portrayed on television as well.

Yu: Can I just say that I was never so clueless that I would mistake a godawful sexual harassment training video for a dirty movie?

Lai: Right? The best part is that all of the kids – not only Eddie—mistake it for a dirty movie. Even with their different backgrounds, all of them are on the same level—in the dark—when it comes to puberty and sex. But do you think Eddie’s sleepover really got him closer to acceptance from the white kids at school?

Yu: Baby steps. That damn kid Brock sabotaged Eddie’s social climb.

Lai: Or did it just make him seem more weird? Jessica did offer pork bone soup to them, right?

Yu: It’s good for hearing.

Lai: I was honestly surprised though, that there weren’t more “Ew! What’s that?” moments at Eddie’s house when they were sleeping over. I don’t think Jessica offered them Hi-C Ecto Coolers like Brock’s mom would have done.

Awkwafina: I remember the first time I brought people over to my grandmother’s house—they definitely judged the way that I lived and how different it was from the way that they lived. But they didn’t say “ew.” It was more of a silent judgment.

It was around that age that I started to appreciate the non-Asian friends who warmly accepted my grandma’s ox-tail soup or steamed red bean buns even though they had never tried them before. This was when I was around 8 or 9-years old, well into high school.

Yu: There was always a fear when other kids came over that they’d think your house or family was weird. The weird decorations, the smell. Maybe that’s why I started hanging out with more Asian kids.

Awkwafina: It was intensely nerve-racking. I had some Asian friends in elementary school, and I remembered feeling like I could relate to them when I first went into their homes, like I understood certain things about them by default.

Lai: When you guys had sleepovers, did you try to make it as “non-Asian” as possible? Did your family order in non-Asian food for dinner?

Yu: Pizza. Pizza all the way.

Awkwafina: YES PIZZA!!

Yu: It was universally accepted. Non-threatening.

Awkwafina: But I guess that’s kind of racist in its own way too… Assuming the white kids who are coming over will love the pizza. Imagine if we went over to someone’s house and they went out of their way to cook chou tofu.

Lai: Good point. My mother once made steamed broccoli, stir-fried chicken, and rice for dinner, and even that seemed totally foreign to my elementary school friends, who couldn’t use chopsticks. On the flip side, what was it like for you guys to sleepover at non-Asian friends’ houses?

Awkwafina: I remember it looking like the house from As Good As It Gets. There was always a difference I felt staying in someone else’s house. It was like a dream world. I remember feeling like “one day, I’m going to live like this.” Cabinets stacked with wholesale Chewy bars and speakers hidden in the ceiling that play light jazz.

Lai: They had so many different types of cereal, tons of candy and snack foods, and juice. Walking into my non-Asian friends’ homes was like an absolute fantasy. It was like walking into every show I’d ever seen on TV.

Yu: Haha. I remember seeing allllll the snacks, “People eat like this?”

Lai: We all experienced a bit of culture shock at sleepovers. I hope we get to see Eddie experience that on the show too.

Awkwafina: I also think that a suburban house in Orlando is always going to be different from a tiny apartment in Queens. I’ve been to some very Americanized Asian households, and it seems like the Huang’s household on TV is rather Americanized.

Lai: How so?

Awkwafina: For instance, the interior of the house doesn’t have any new years decorations or any of the kind of half-assed interior decorating that most Asian moms do. My grandma, for instance, was the most ratchet unnecessary decorator in the world. She was super into the calendars you get for free at the Chinese supermarket, (very obviously) fake plants. She had this whole cabinet filled with little glass things and figurines.

Lai: Same! But my house had a bunch of mirrors and mysterious figurines of old wise Chinese men with beards. What were yours?

Awkwafina: Fat little children riding a radish. Literally like 10 heads in the radish.

Awkwafina: I like the grandmother on the show—she kind of reminds me of the grandma from My Big Fat Greek Wedding. My own grandmother definitely had that old-world “Mao took my house” vibe, but she also watched the Nightly News, OJ, and Court TV on a constant loop.

Lai: That’s being Asian American.

 

http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2015/02/20/fresh_off_the_boat_roundtable_pizza_sleepovers_and_parental_sex_talks.html

2 trans men prove an important point with a simple photo shoot.

Upworthy   by

Transgender Magazine Recreates Naked Adam Levine Photo

Model, Aydian Dowling shows the sexy side of this equality movement.

BuzzFeed   2/17/2015   by jasonrballard

Trans Man Aydian Dowling posing naked for FTM Magazine photo recreation.

Trans Man Aydian Dowling posing naked for FTM Magazine photo recreation.
Jason Robert Ballard / Via ftmmagazine.com

We’ve all seen the iconic photo of Adam Levine with his wife’s hands over his respective ‘junk’… FTM Magazine publisher, Jason Robert Ballard saw similarities in model Aydian Dowling’s physique and Levine’s and set to making a recreation of the image.

“Some areas of my body used to remind me of everything I’m not. Now they represent everything I am” – Dowling

You can find more about Aydian and FTM Magazine at www.ftmmagazine.com where Aydian is the cover model April 2015. (And a nice big pull out poster!)

 

http://www.buzzfeed.com/jasonrobertb/transgender-magazine-recreates-naked-adam-levine-p-1c4ex

Why Amazon is willing to spend billions on Prime Instant Video

Business Insider   2/16/2015   by Adam Levy, The Motley Fool

When Amazon.com reported its fourth quarter earnings last month, the announcement came with an interesting note from CEO Jeff Bezos. He wrote in the earnings release that Amazon “paid billions of dollars for Prime shipping and invested $1.3 billion in Prime Instant Video.”

That amount includes funding for its original productions like Transparent and licensing for other popular content. It might fall short of the $3.2 billion Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ) spent on content in 2014, but Amazon is expected to further increase its Prime video investments this year.

But why is the company willing to spend so much on programming for a service that started out as a flat-fee shipping program?

Because content is key to retaining Prime members

The determining factor as to whether or not Prime subscribers renew their membership is not how much they shop on Amazon but whether or not they watch video.

On the third quarter conference call, CFO Tom Szkutak told investors, “Those customers who are streaming are renewing at considerably higher rates … When customers come in for … free trials and they engage from a video content standpoint, we see the conversion being higher.”

Therefore, it is important for Amazon to maintain a compelling library of content — and that does not come cheap.

As mentioned, Netflix spent approximately $3.2 billion on programming last year. Hulu spent approximately $750 million on licensing and millions more on originals. With both companies competing with Amazon for exclusive rights to the hottest titles, the prices will only continue to climb.

At some point it becomes unprofitable

There must be a breaking point for the three players, where the price is simply too high. But I would venture to guess that Amazon is ultimately willing to pay more than both stand-alone streaming services, as the retail king continues to make money from Prime members shopping on the site.

While Amazon has to foot the bill for two-day shipping as well as video content, we know that it would rather sell something to Prime members than nothing at all. In fact, Prime members spend more than non-members. Mr. Szkutak noted “Prime members are buying more.” While he did not give details on how much more, a survey by RBC Capital last summer puts the number as high as 68%. With a gross margin of 29.5% in 2014, Amazon has plenty of room to maneuver.

With the initial subscription price approximately matching the yearly rate of both Netflix and Hulu, it is safe to say Prime subscriptions ultimately produce more cash flow than Netflix and Hulu subscriptions. That puts Amazon in a strong position to outbid its competitors for new content, while still making money from Prime.

Do not underestimate the power of cash

Amazon ended 2014 with $17.4 billion in cash and investments. Comparatively, Netflix had just $1.6 billion.

In a fourth quarter letter to shareholders, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings told investors that the company will look to raise at least $1 billion in debt this year to help fund its content purchases as the rest of cash flow goes toward building out its service around the world. While interest rates remain low, the fact that Netflix must borrow to fund content acquisition will significantly impact the amount it is willing to bid, and the company has noted that it will have to factor interest expenses into its content budget.

That leaves Amazon in a position to buy more content at an effectively lower price than Netflix, while producing more revenue per subscriber through Prime.

Video is the key to making Amazon Prime work. Even if Amazon does not offer the best prices on the Internet, most Prime subscribers will choose Amazon anyway because of convenience and the psychological impact of already having paid the subscription fee. For Amazon, this “moat” around Prime explains Amazon is willing to spend billions on new Prime Instant Video content.

 

This article originally appeared at The Motley Fool. Copyright 2015.

http://www.businessinsider.com/why-amazon-is-willing-to-spend-billions-on-prime-instant-video-2015-2

Jay R. Ferguson To Star In ABC’s Dan Savage Comedy Pilot

Deadline   2/19  

Mad Men‘s Jay R. Ferguson is set for a lead role in the ABC/ABC Studios untitled Dan Savage comedy pilot.

Written by David Windsor and Casey Johnson loosely based on the life of gay activist and author Dan Savage, the single-camera project revolves around the O’Neals, a seemingly perfect All-American family. When the youngest son comes out of the closet, all the family secrets are revealed and the family proves to be quite typical and not so perfect. Ferguson, will play the father, Pat O’Neal, a good-natured, affable cop with the Chicago police department.

Ferguson’s casting stems from the talent/development deal he signed with ABC Studios in August, following their collaboration last season on the Save The Date pilot.

Ferguson, repped by Paradigm and Wishlab, will next be seen reprising his role as Stan Rizzo in the final episodes of Mad Men.

The Dan Savage pilot is executive produced by Johnson, Windsor, Savage, Lorenzo Di Bonaventura, Dan McDermott and Brian Pines.

http://deadline.com/2015/02/jay-r-ferguson-cast-dan-savage-comedy-pilot-abc-1201377275/

Call Off the Dogs

2/14/2015   The New York Times   by Maureen Dowd

WASHINGTON — I’LL pay for this column.

The Rottweilers will be unleashed.

Once the Clintons had a War Room. Now they have a Slime Room.

Once they had the sly James Carville, fondly known as “serpenthead.” Now they have the slippery David Brock, accurately known as a snake.

Brock fits into the Clinton tradition of opportunistic knife-fighters like Dick Morris and Mark Penn.

The silver-haired 52-year-old, who sports colorful designer suits and once wore a monocle, brawled his way into a Times article about the uneasy marriage between Hillary Clinton’s veteran attack dogs and the group of advisers who are moving over from Obamaland.

Hillary hasn’t announced a 2016 campaign yet. She’s busy polling more than 200 policy experts on how to show that she really cares about the poor while courting the banks. Yet her shadow campaign is already in a déjà-vu-all-over-again shark fight over control of the candidate and her money. It’s the same old story: The killer organization that, even with all its ruthless hired guns, can’t quite shoot straight.

Squabbling competing factions helped Hillary squander a quarter-of-a-billion dollars in 2008.

As Nicholas Confessore and Amy Chozick chronicled, the nasty dispute spilled into public and Brock resigned last week from the board of a pro-Clinton “super-PAC” called Priorities USA Action — whose co-chairman is Jim Messina, Obama’s 2012 campaign manager — accusing the political action committee of “an orchestrated political hit job” and “the kind of dirty trick I’ve witnessed in the right-wing and would not tolerate then.”

He should know.

The former “right-wing hit man,” and impresario of “dirty tricks,” as Brock has said of himself, made his living in the ’90s sliming Anita Hill as “a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty” and breaking the Troopergate story, which accused Arkansas state troopers of setting up liaisons for Bill Clinton and spurred Paula Jones’s 1994 sexual harassment lawsuit.

He has tried to discredit anyone who disagreed with his ideological hits (myself and reporters I know included). And that’s still the business he’s in, simply on the other side as a Hillary zealot. (His conversion began in 1996 when he published a biography of Hillary that was not a total hit job and that began the thaw.)

Just as Bill Clinton was able to forgive another architect of the vast right-wing conspiracy, Richard Mellon Scaife, once Scaife was charmed by Hillary in person and began giving money to the Clinton foundation, so, too, was Bill won over by Brock’s book, “Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative,” and Brock’s Media Matters and Correct the Record websites, which ferociously push back against any Hillary coverage that isn’t fawning.

With the understood blessing of the Clintons, Brock runs a $28 million cluster of media monitoring groups and oppo research organizations that are vehicles to rebut and at times discredit and threaten anyone who casts a gimlet eye at Clinton Inc.

As Confessore and Chozick wrote, he uses a fund-raiser named Mary Pat Bonner, whose firm has collected millions of dollars in commissions — a practice many fund-raising experts consider unethical.

Everyone wants to be at the trough for this one because Hillary is likely to raise, and more important, spend more than $1 billion on her campaign.

The Clinton crowd is trying to woo Brock back into the fold because he’s good at getting money and knows how their enemies think. The Clintons appreciate the fact that Brock, like Morris, is a take-no-prisoners type with the ethical compass of a jackal. Baked in the tactics of the right, Brock will never believe that negative coverage results from legitimate shortcomings. Instead, it’s all personal, all false, and all a war.

This is a bad harbinger for those who had hoped that Hillary would “kill off the wild dogs,” as one Obama loyalist put it, and Bill would leave behind the sketchy hangers-on in the mold of Ron Burkle and Jeffrey Epstein.

Hillary’s inability to dispense with brass-knuckle, fanatical acolytes like Brock shows that she still has an insecure streak that requires Borgia-like blind loyalty, and can’t distinguish between the real vast right-wing conspiracy and the voices of legitimate concern.

Money-grubbing is always the ugly place with the Clintons, who have devoured $2.1 billion in contributions since 1992 to their political campaigns, family foundation and philanthropies, according to The Old (Good) New Republic.

David Axelrod, the author of a new memoir, “Believer,” wrote that Hillary’s past gurus, Morris and Penn, were nonbelievers — mercenary, manipulative and avaricious. He told Politico’s Glenn Thrush that he would have advised Hillary not to cash in with her book and six-figure speeches.

Axelrod reiterated to me that Hillary’s designated campaign chairman, John Podesta, Bill Clinton’s last chief of staff who left his post as an Obama counselor on Friday, “has the strength and standing to enforce a kind of campaign discipline that hasn’t existed before.”

But, for now, what Republicans say about government is true of the Clintons: They really do believe that your money belongs to them.

Someday, they should give their tin cup to the Smithsonian. It’s one of the wonders of the world.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-call-off-the-dogs.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&bicmp=AD&bicmlukp=WT.mc_id&bicmst=1409232722000&bicmet=1419773522000&_r=1&referrer=