Inquiry in Cover-Up of Ohio Rape Yields Indictment of Four Adults

By
Published: November 25, 2013 | The New York Times

Four adults in the school system of Steubenville, Ohio, including the superintendent, were indicted Monday by a grand jury looking into the cover-up of a rape that drew national attention and outrage because students recorded it on social media but did not alert the authorities.

Michael McVey, 50, the superintendent of Steubenville City Schools, was indicted on a charge of obstructing justice, along with three others including an elementary school principal, eight months after two teenage football stars were found guilty of raping a 16-year-old girl.

The case was widely followed because social media also seemed to be on trial: teenagers exchanged scores of text messages and cellphone images documenting the assault, during a night of drunken parties in August 2012. The police learned of it only when the girl’s parents gave them a flash drive two days later filled with graphic Twitter posts and video.

“While this started out being about the kids, it is also just as much about the parents, about the grown-ups, about the adults,” said Mike DeWine, Ohio’s attorney general, in announcing the charges.

The attorney general offered no details on Monday about what led to the charges against the superintendent, including felony counts of tampering with evidence and obstructing justice.

But a person in law enforcement with knowledge of the grand jury said the charges were related not to the August 2012 rape, but to an accusation of an earlier rape, in April 2012, of a 14-year-old student, who came forward after the publicity over the case involving the football players.

Both cases have been handled by the attorney general, who stepped in after the local prosecutor recused herself.

Online activists, including Anonymous, a hacker group, turned the case into a cause célèbre by accusing the community of closing ranks to protect its athletic heroes.

Many in Steubenville, a struggling industrial town on the Ohio River border with West Virginia, resented the scrutiny, accusing outsiders of painting with too broad a brush.

After a four-day trial in March, a judge convicted the two football players, a former quarterback and a former wide receiver.

The indictment against the elementary school principal, Lynett Gorman, 40, on a charge of failing to report child abuse, related to the earlier case of the 14-year-old girl. Two others were charged in the case of the 16-year-old: a high school wrestling coach, Seth Fluharty, 26, charged with failing to report child abuse, and Matthew Bellardine, 26, a former assistant football coach, who was charged with allowing under-age drinking and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

In an interview last year, Mr. McVey said that he was satisfied at the time of the episode that the head football coach, Reno Saccoccia, would take care of the matter and discipline his players.

Mr. Saccoccia was not indicted. His winning Big Red teams are so popular they regularly fill the hometown side of a stadium known as Death Valley, whose 10,000 seats could accommodate more than half Steubenville’s population.

At the trial of the two players convicted in March, Trent Mays and Ma’lik Richmond, a text message was read from Mr. Mays stating that he had persuaded Mr. Saccoccia “to take care of it” and that his coach “was joking about it so I’m not that worried.”

Asked at a news conference about the head coach, Mr. DeWine said he was forbidden to speak about the grand jury investigation, which he praised as thorough. “Every possible charge against any possible individual was considered,” he said.

Earlier, seeming to anticipate the question, Mr. DeWine said: “Some may ask why others were not indicted. Under our system of justice the grand jury must have probable cause to believe all the elements of a criminal offense are present.”

“It is simply not sufficient that a person’s behavior was reprehensible, disgusting, mean-spirited or just plain stupid,” he said. Mr. DeWine said he did not anticipate further indictments, barring new evidence.

Robert Fitzsimmons, a lawyer representing the victim and her family, said the system had worked. “We’re very satisfied with the decision,” he said. That the head coach was not indicted after being the subject of rumors, he added, “teaches everyone we shouldn’t point fingers until the evidence is known.”

If convicted, Mr. McVey could serve more than five years in prison.

Mr. DeWine criticized the adults who he said had failed to set boundaries for teenagers, and he criticized social media, for allowing people to instantly spread information without responsibility.

“Technology makes it possible to disseminate words and information, either true or false, at the push of a button,” he said. “We don’t have to look each other in the eye — leaving an electronic barrier that divorces us from shame and from the hurt felt by others.”

Juliet Macur and Nate Schweber contributed reporting.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: November 25, 2013

An earlier version of this article, a picture caption and a web summary misstated the link between the four indictments and the rape of a 16-year-old girl last year. While the indictments resulted from a grand jury inquiry into a cover-up of that case, two charges — including obstruction against the schools superintendent of Steubenville — involved another rape case, that of a 14-year-old. The article also misstated the job of one of the adults indicted. She is an elementary school principal, not an elementary school teacher.

What Does the Book Business Look Like on the Inside?

11/16/2013 By

Harold Evans, the publisher of Random House, calls me at The New Yorker, where I work. “I’d like to have a word with you,” he says. “Can we have coffee sometime, perhaps?”

It is 1995, and Evans and I have met at parties given by his wife, who happens to be Tina Brown, who happens to be the editor of The New Yorker.

“How about today?”

“Let me check with my assistant,” ­Evans says. A minute or so later, he says, “Well, yes—can you come up right now?” The vowels, in his Beatles-esque accent, make the words sound a little like “coom oop.”

At the elevator bank of The New Yorker, I run into Nancy Franklin, later to become the TV critic for the magazine. We call each other “Nosy,” for “Nosy Parker”—the British slang term for a snoop. “Where are you going at this time of day, Nosy?” Nancy says.

“To see Harry Evans,” I say.

“Oh, no!” she says. And at this point, with a cold, sick feeling, I realize what’s going on: Tina now wants me out of the magazine and has persuaded her husband to offer me a job.

**********************

“You want to buy this book, Dan?” my boss, Ann Godoff, says, referring to the first work I’m trying to acquire at Random House, by George Saunders. “Well, do a P-and-L for it and we’ll see.”

“What’s a P-and-L?”

“I’ll walk you through it. What’s the advance?”

My only knowledge came from what I had been paid for my own books, so I thought surely I should offer more. “Fifty thousand dollars?”

“For a book of stories? But okay, what’s the payout?”

“Payout?”

“Start with how much of the advance the author will get on signing the contract.”

“Thirty thousand dollars?”

“Twenty-five—half on signing.”

“Okay, 25.”

“On delivery-and-acceptance?”

“Well, 25, I guess.”

“No—you have to have an on-pub payment.”

“Oh. Twenty for D-and-A? And five on-pub?”

“Nothing for paperback on-pub?”

“Oh. Ten for D-and-A, ten for on-pub, and five for the paperback?”

“Nah—it’s okay. You don’t really need a paperback payment. I just wanted to mention it. How many hardcovers are we going to print at the start?”

“Twenty thousand?”

“Too much. Ten.”

“Okay.”

“Second printing?”

“Five?”

“Good! Returns?”

“Returns?”

“How many unsold hardcovers will booksellers send back?”

“Five hundred?”

“Nah. Usually figure one third—in this case, 5,000.”

“Whoa!”

“It’s a shitty business, Dan. What’s the price?”

“Twenty-one ninety-five?” I say, using my own most recent book as a guide.

“Good. So how much will we earn against this advance?”

“____”

“We make about $3 for each hardcover sale, $1 for each paperback.”

“So if we sell 10,000 hardcovers, that’s $30,000.”

“Right.”

“And say 10,000 paperbacks. That’s $40,000.”

“Right—so the P-and-L probably won’t work. So we have to adjust the figures. But remember, you can’t change the returns percentage.”

“Increase the first printing to 15,000 and the second printing to 7,500?”

“That ought to do it. Isn’t this scientific?”

**********************

Now I have been senior literary editor at Random House for six months. I remain in many ways ignorant of the realities of book publishing. But it begins to dawn on me that if a company publishes a hundred original hardcover books a year, it publishes about two per week, on average. And given the limitations on budgets, personnel, and time, many of those books will receive a kind of “basic” publication. Every list—spring, summer, and fall—has its lead titles. Then there are three or four hopefuls trailing along just behind the books that the publisher is investing most heavily in. Then comes a field of also-rans, hoping for the surge of energy provided by an ecstatic front-page review in The New York Times Book Review or by being selected for Oprah’s Book Club. Approximately four out of every five books published lose money. Or five out of six, or six out of seven. Estimates vary, depending on how gloomy the CFO is the day you ask him and what kinds of shell games are being played in Accounting.

I am trying to acquire two novels, one completed and the second under way, by a British writer. Ann Godoff likes the finished book, or takes my word for it that it’s good, or she is in a good mood, and has authorized me to offer $100,000 for each book. On the phone to the agent in England, I say, with no guile, “We’re offering a hundred thousand dollars for both books.” He says, with acceptance detectable in his voice, “You mean $50,000 for each?”

I hesitate, but not too long. “Yes.”

“Done and done.”

**********************

Steven Pinker is in my office at Random House. I am trying to get him to consider writing a short, essayistic book in popular language on the question of Free Will.

Pinker decides that he can’t do this book, owing to contractual obligations to another publisher. He notices a book jacket on my desk for a collection of poems by Katha ­Pollitt. The title, fittingly enough, is The Mind-Body Problem. Pinker says, “Oh! You know, my friend Rebecca Goldstein wrote a novel with this same title. I’d like it if you could change the title of this book.”

“Well, you can’t copyright a title,” I say. “And wasn’t that novel published some years ago?”

“Yes, but I would appreciate it if this title could be changed.”

I tell myself that I choose to table this request, and that I will end up leaving Random House before Pollitt’s book comes out. As it happens, I do.

**********************

I am assigned to work with Michael ­Eisner on his autobiographical book, Work in Progress. I meet him a couple of times, and he is perfectly congenial. He tells me how foolish it was for anyone to call any movie anything like The Lemon Sisters—inviting, as it did, all kinds of review snidery. “On the other hand, we had a great success with a movie whose title had three words that each by itself should have spelled death at the box office,” he adds.

“What was it?” I say.

Dead. Poets. Society.

**********************

Atul Gawande has been writing ­wonderful pieces about medicine for The New Yorker. I have gotten in touch with him about the possibility of publishing these essays. His agent advises him not to do so, as collections of previously published essays generally don’t do well.

I see the agent at a party. I press my suit once again, in person. Either because I’m so persuasive (unlikely) or because Gawan­de doesn’t have the time to write an original work, they finally relent. The agent sends out a submission to a number of publishers.

On the morning of the closing, Gawan­de calls me because he wants to work with me but has heard from his agent that the acquisition will go to someone else. “I don’t want this to happen,” he says. I tell him that I am trying to get more money. Five minutes later, the agent calls and says, “I understand that Atul called you about the situation with his book.”

“Yes, he did—his book which I have been encouraging him to do for a couple of years now, and which I don’t want to lose.”

“Well, he didn’t have the authority to call you,” she says.

“That’s funny—that word has the word author in it,” I say.

**********************

Publishing is an often incredibly frustrating culture. If you want to buy a project—let’s say a nonfiction proposal for a book about the history of Sicily—some of your colleagues will say, “The proposal is too dry” or “Cletis Trebuchet did a book for Grendel Books five years ago about Sardinia and it sold, like, eight copies,” or, airily, “I don’t think many people want to read about little islands.” When Seabiscuit first came up for discussion at an editorial meeting at Random House, some skeptic muttered, “Talk about beating a dead horse!”

To make matters worse, financial success in frontlist publishing is very often random, but the media conglomerates that run most publishing houses act as if it were not. Yes, you may be able to count on a new novel by Surething Jones becoming a big best seller. But the best-­seller lists paint nothing remotely like the full financial picture of any publication, because that picture’s most important color is the size of the advance. But let’s say you publish a fluky blockbuster one year, the corporation will see a spike in your profits and sort of autistically, or at least automatically, raise the profit goal for your division by some corporately predetermined amount for the following year. This is close to clinically insane institutional behavior.

**********************

The publisher of HarperCollins takes me to lunch and offers me a job as executive editor. I tell Ann Godoff, who has replaced Harry Evans as publisher.

“Who made the offer?” Ann says.

“Well, it doesn’t really make any difference, does it?” I say. “It’s a respectable competitor.”

“But you don’t really want to leave, do you?”

“Ann, I have one kid going to college and one kid who will be going in a few years.”

“Well, I got you a bonus this year, don’t forget.”

“I know, and I appreciate it, but still, there’s a real differential in this offer.”

“And we gave you a bonus for Primary Colors.

“Well, no, actually, I never got a bonus for that.”

“Really?”

“Really. I was so ignorant that I didn’t know that I might have gotten a bonus for that.”

“I was sure you got a bonus. I’ll have to look it up and see what happened.”

“I’d like to stay, all things being equal, but they’re not. Equal.”

“This is Random House, Dan. You know you don’t want to leave. Come on, tell me who made the offer.”

“Okay—HarperCollins.”

“I hate what they do,” Ann says.

“What? Publish books?”

**********************

I work at HarperCollins for so little time—less than two years—that it ends up feeling more like a walkabout than any kind of era in my working life. But a conversation that I have at HarperCollins with an agent stands out for its typicality. I’m trying to acquire a “Best of the Year” collection. The agent wants to “move” the series from its old publisher because he thinks the old publisher didn’t do enough to promote it.

“How many copies did it sell last year?”

“Fifteen thousand.”

“Fifteen thousand as in 12,500?”

“Yeah, about that. Twelve thousand five hundred.”

“Twelve thousand five hundred as in eleven?”

“Twelve-five as in twelve.”

“So it sold about eleven-five?”

“Yeah.”

**********************

Gina Centrello, who has replaced Ann Godoff as publisher of Random House, calls me and asks me to return to the division as editor-in-chief. It’s my impression that since Godoff’s departure some time ago, naming an editor-in-chief has become an urgent matter. I know, through publishing’s chronic gossip affliction, that Centrello has offered the job to one or two others, who turned the offer down. I don’t.

Manuscripts and proposals and file folders cover the floor of my office. When my friends Chip McGrath or David ­McCormick complain about the work he has to do, I always say, “I wish you could sit in my chair for ten minutes if you want to know what real hard work is like.” Or I must always say that, because one day when I’m having dinner with Chip, he says, “I wish you could sit in my chair for ten or fifteen minutes, and then you’d know what real hard work is.” Then he laughs, and I realize he’s mimicking me.

But the work is hard. In fact, I think it’s impossible to do an editor-in-chief’s job very well for any length of time. If I belong anywhere, it probably isn’t in publishing. But, then, I keep forgetting that this sense of dissatisfaction explains why work is called “work.” Like the teenager I was and in some ways still am, I grouse about and make fun of what I have to do and the people who tell me I have to do it, even when those people are me. For all kinds of reasons, I simply have not grown all the way up. And never will. But then again, I know very few people who have. The best most of us can do is manage intermittent maturity; this was especially important in the raising of my children and in my work as editor-in-chief.

**********************

My colleague Jonathan Karp leaves Random House to run his own imprint at Hachette. As executive editor-in-chief, I travel to visit Laura Hillenbrand, author of Seabiscuit, to try to persuade her not to ­follow Karp.

There is a flag on her lawn. I say how I admire her patriotism, especially given who the president is at the moment. When I get back to the office the next day, Gina Centrello comes into my office with an annoyed look on her face. “You said something negative about George Bush to Laura Hillenbrand,” she says.

“Well, just barely,” I say.

“You’re lucky,” Centrello says. “She’s going to stay with us, but she doesn’t want to work with you.”

“Why not?”

“Because she’s a good friend of Laura Bush.”

**********************

Gina Centrello takes me to lunch and lets me know that she would like me to step aside as editor-in-chief. Why? Numbers, evidently. Prizes—lack thereof. My high salary. It comes back to me that Harry Evans, when he hired me, said, “You have five years to fook oop.” I have barely finished four years.

Centrello is a good publisher. She knows the numbers. And my numbers, insofar as they are mine, have been mediocre, at best. Later, the numerous prizes “my” authors win look to me like the work of an ironic deity—Elizabeth Strout wins the Pulitzer Prize for Olive Kitteridge, Colum McCann the National Book Award for Let the Great World Spin, and Siddhartha Mukherjee the Pulitzer in nonfiction for his book about cancer. In the meantime, I keep wondering if there are other, more personal factors at work in my being let go, but in the end, in such situations, it doesn’t matter, does it? When it comes to corporate life, especially at its higher altitudes, factors of all kinds tend to get tangled up with each other. And it’s impossible to untangle them, and pointless, and fruitless, to try.

Excerpted from My Mistake: A Memoir, ­published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. © 2013 by Daniel Menaker.

*This article appears in the November 26, 2013 issue of New York Magazine.

Pamela Oas Williams VRP

Pamela Oas Williams VRP

 

IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931423/

IMDB Pro: http://pro.imdb.com/name/nm0931423/

 

Company:

 

Pam Williams Productions

Phone: 310-425-8981

 

Laura Ziskin Productions

10202 W Washington Blvd
Astaire Bldg, Ste 1310
Culver City, CA 90232

Phone: +1 310 425-8981

Fax: +1 310-876-1309

 

Producer credits:

Hole in the Fence (2014) – executive producer

Lee Daniels’ The Butler (2013/I) – producer (as Pam Williams)

Malibu Country (18 episodes)

Pilot (2 November 2012) – executive producer (as Pam Williams)

Latest episode: All You Single Ladies (22 March 2013) – executive producer

The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) – production executive

Stand Up to Cancer (2009 TV movie) – executive producer

The 79th Annual Academy Awards (2007 TV special) – producer (pre-show)

Tarzan (2 episodes)

Pilot (5 October 2003) – producer

Secrets and Lies (12 October 2003) – supervising producer

The 74th Annual Academy Awards (2002 TV special) – producer

Fail Safe (2000 TV movie) – executive producer

Out All Night (18 episodes)

(September 1992 – July 1993) – coordinating producer

The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air (4 episodes)

(10 September 1990) – coordinating producer

The Pioneer Woman (????) – producer (as Pam Williams)

The Spellman Files (????) – production executive

 

Award:

Primetime Emmy Awards 2011

Nominated: Outstanding Nonfiction Special for Stand Up to Cancer (2009).

Shared With: Laura Ziskin (executive producer), Michael B. Seligman (supervising producer)

Claire Danes Charlie Rose Interview: Actress Discusses Her ‘Homeland’ Character, Preferred Roles (VIDEO)

“Charlie Rose” interview with Claire Danes about hypomanic behavior

Claire Danes’ work as the protagonist of “Homeland” has captivated audiences, but it turns out she adores the character as well. She told Charlie Rose: “I love her, I admire her and I wish I could be her.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/13/claire-danes-charlie-rose_n_4271373.html?utm_hp_ref=entertainment&ir=Entertainment (00:25)

 

Running through the possibilities for 2016

“Hardball with Chris Matthews” with David Brock mention

http://www.msnbc.com/hardball?cid=sky|ps|Google|b-Hardball|hardball_with_chris_matthews

11/13/13 clip called Running through the possibilities for 2016 (2:42)

When it comes down to brass tacks, who has what it takes to win in 2016? John Feheery and Bob Shrum discuss the variables.

 

 

BLUE IS THE WARMEST COLOR VRP

Trailer:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfpOSmvzAW0

 

IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2278871/?ref_=sr_1

 

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Is_the_Warmest_Colour

 

Blue is the Warmest Color, also known as Adele: Chapters 1 & 2, is a 2013 French romantic drama film about a 15-year-old Adele whose life is transformed when she meets Emma, a blue-haired art student at a nearby college, who instigates a romance.

 

It won the Palme d’Or at the 2013 Cannes Film Festival, and became the first film to be awarded the prize to both the director and the lead actresses. In addition, this is also the first film adapted from either a graphic novel or a comic to win the Palme d’Or.

 

The film is based on the 2010 French graphic novel Blue Angel (“Le Bleu est une couleur chaude“) by Julie Maroh, which won several awards and will be published in North America in October 2013 (on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Blue-Warmest-Color-Julie-Maroh-ebook/dp/B00EV6T6DQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1383936700&sr=8-1&keywords=Blue+Angel). The film had its North American premiere at the 2013 Telluride Film Festival.

 

On 20 August 2013, the Motion Picture Association of America awarded the film an NC-17 rating for “explicit sexual content”. The film will be released without any cuts. The film is scheduled to be released on 25 October in America and on 15 November in the United Kingdom. However, director Abdellatif Kechiche stated in an interview in September 2013 that the film should not be released. Speaking to French magazine Télérama, Kechiche said “I think this film should not go out; it was too sullied”.

 

Plot: Adele’s life is changed when she meets Emma, a young woman with blue hair, who will allow her to discover desire, to assert herself as a woman and as an adult. In front of others, Adele grows, seeks herself, loses herself, finds herself.

 

Cast & Crew:

Director: Abdellatif Kechiche

Screen Writers: Abdellatif Kechiche & Ghalia Lacroix

Producers: Brahim Chioua, Abdellatif Kechiche, Vincent Maraval

Main Actresses:

Adèle Exarchopoulos as Adèle

Léa Seydoux as Emma

 

Production:

Initially planned to be shot in two-and-a-half months, the film took five, from March to August 2012 for a budget of €4 million. Seven hundred and fifty hours of dailies were shot. Shooting took place in Lille as well as Roubaix and Liévin.

 

Production company: Quat’sous Films; Wild Bunch; France 2 Cinéma (co-production);  Scope Pictures (co-production); Vértigo Films (co-production); Radio Télévision Belge Francophone (RTBF) (co-production)

 

Box Office:

Opening Wknd:  $100K (USA)

Gross: $382K (USA)

 

Reviews:

 

Cannes Film Review: ‘Blue Is the Warmest Color’

http://variety.com/2013/film/reviews/cannes-film-review-blue-is-the-warmest-color-1200486043/

 

“I have infinite tenderness for you,” one woman tells another in “Blue Is the Warmest Color,” and it’s a sentiment that also describes director Abdellatif Kechiche’s attitude toward his characters in this searingly intimate, daringly attenuated portrait of a French teenager and her passionate relationship with another femme. Post-screening chatter will inevitably swirl around not only the galvanizing performances of Adele Exarchopoulos and Lea Seydoux, but also the fact that they spend much of this three-hour emotional epic enacting the most explosively graphic lesbian sex scenes in recent memory. The result is certain to stir excitement and controversy on the fest circuit while limiting the film’s arthouse potential, barring significant trims for length and content.

 

Still, it’s a measure of the honesty and generosity of Kechiche’s storytelling that the picture’s explicit sexuality and extreme running time feel consistent with his raw, sensual embrace of all aspects of life, an approach also apparent in the writer-director’s masterful 2007 drama “The Secret of the Grain.” Indeed, it would be reductive to slap an exclusive gay-interest label on “Blue Is the Warmest Color,” a bildungsroman and first-love story whose deep and abiding fascination with life’s great shared pleasures — food, sex, art, literature, music, conversation — encourages the viewer to consider the commonality as well as the vast complexity of human experience.

 

Having previously examined the lives of artistically inclined youth in 2004’s “Games of Love and Chance,” Kechiche and co-writer Ghalya Lacroix (who also served as one of four editors) have narrowed their focus yet deepened their emotional palette with this very loose adaptation of Julie Maroh’s 2010 graphic novel, “Le Bleu est une couleur chaude.” Fittingly for a story about a girl’s sentimental education, the film’s French title, “La Vie d’Adele: Chapitres 1 et 2,” is a nod to Pierre de Marivaux’s unfinished 18th-century novel“La Vie de Marianne” — an assigned text at the Lille high school where we first meet Adele (Exarchopoulos), a sensitive, unassuming 15-year-old with a passion for literature.

 

As the film soon makes clear, following a brief romance with cute classmate Thomas (Jeremie Laheurte), Adele also harbors feelings for women — specifically, for a university fine-arts student named Emma (Seydoux), a pale beauty whose short blonde hair is streaked an alluring, rebellious blue. After an encounter at a lesbian bar followed by a series of meetings, during which the older, worldlier Emma gently puts the nervous, inexperienced Adele at ease, the two eventually become lovers.

 

All this unfolds in Kechiche’s signature style of long, flowing conversations marked by overlapping dialogue, performed in a vein of seemingly artless naturalism, but sculpted with unerring precision and a strong sense of drive. Captured in dynamic widescreen closeups by d.p. Sofian El Fani, these sequences crackle with humor and tension that can build, without warning, to moments of piercing emotion, as when Adele is cruelly humiliated by her friends upon discovery of her same-sex inclinations. More encouragingly, Adele is invited over to dine with Emma’s warm, freely accepting mother and stepfather, who are perhaps too tidily contrasted with Adele’s stiffer, more conservative parents, who are blithely unaware of the nature of the girls’ relationship.

 

The audience, by contrast, is spared nothing. Given the film’s interest in the rhythms and nuances of human communication, the explicitness and duration of the sex scenes here should come as little surprise. Still, it’s scorching, NC-17-level stuff, if it gets rated at all; the individual scenes are sustained for minutes at a time and lensed from a multitude of angles, with enough wide shots to erase any suspicion of body doubles. Trying out almost every position imaginable and blurring the line between simulated and unsimulated acts, Exarchopoulos and Seydoux are utterly fearless, conveying an almost feral hunger as their characters make love with increasing abandon. Audience titillation, though certainly there for the taking, couldn’t be more beside the point; each coupling signifies a deeper level of intimacy, laying an emotional foundation that pays off to shattering effect in the film’s third hour.

 

While these experiences supply moments of powerful realization for Adele, “Blue Is the Warmest Color” is not, strictly speaking, a coming-out narrative; both women pointedly refuse to label themselves, and their experiences over the course of the film convey a clear understanding of the complexity of human sexuality. As the narrative jumps ahead almost imperceptibly a few years — observing as Adele becomes a schoolteacher and settles into a comfortable live-in relationship with Emma, now a burgeoning artist — the thematic emphasis shifts from Adele’s social anxiety and fear of being found out to the trickier matter of finding contentment within commitment.

 

It’s a simple, even predictable story, yet textured so exquisitely and acted so forcefully as to feel almost revelatory. Always persuasive as a dreamy object of desire, Seydoux nonetheless surprises with the depth of her control; she has moments of stunning ferocity here, revealing Emma as a generous, open person whose hard, judgmental streak is inextricable from her artistic temperament. But the picture belongs to Exarchopoulos, completely inhabiting a role aptly named after the thesp herself; with her husky voice and sweet, reluctant smile, she plays virtually every emotion a director can demand of an actress, commanding the viewer’s attention and sympathy at every minute. Taxing as the 175-minute running time will be for some audiences, those on the picture’s wavelength will find it continually absorbing.

 

Set in a vibrantly decorated, unmistakably French hipster milieu populated by aspiring painters, writers and actors, the picture feels at once contemporary and happily reminiscent of a time before technology and social media invaded the artistic sphere; computers and cell phones are almost nowhere in sight. As in “The Secret of the Grain,” the camera betrays an almost compulsive fixation with the act of eating, taking on particularly suggestive undertones when Emma teaches Adele how to consume an oyster.

 

Explorations in Identity and Pleasure

Messages of ‘Concussion’ and ‘Blue Is the Warmest Color’

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/movies/messages-of-concussion-and-blue-is-the-warmest-color.html?pagewanted=all

 

In “Blue Is the Warmest Color,” which won the Palme d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival in May, a French teenage girl discovers love, passion and heartbreak in the arms of another woman.

 

“I wanted to give Adèle the personality of a very courageous and free woman,” he said during an interview at the Toronto International Film Festival this month. “She’s hungry for life. She’s open to let her desires play out.” Those desires lead her to Emma (Léa Seydoux), an azure-haired artist with whom she begins a torrid and enduring affair. (The film is freely adapted from a graphic novel by Julie Maroh.)

 

While the male orgasm is unremarkably straightforward, he says, a woman’s ecstasy is “mystical” and “an out-of-body experience.” Such overpowering intensity, he says, has motivated centuries of art in which “men try desperately to depict” that pleasure. To which a female party guest offers: “It could be their fantasy.”

 

But the scene also anticipates how some viewers might find his male vision of female passion problematic. Manohla Dargis of The Times said that while the characters were sympathetic, “Mr. Kechiche registers as oblivious to real women.

 

The longest sex scene in “Blue Is the Warmest Color” takes seven minutes of screen time, but some reports out of Cannes had it over 20 minutes. Within such hyperbole lay both titillation and condemnation, and the possibility that pleasure, with all of its complications, might be worthy again of both show and tell.

 

Jostling for Position in Last Lap at Cannes

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/24/movies/many-films-still-in-running-at-cannes-for-palme-dor.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

 

The camera and its misuses in the well-regarded French entry “Blue Is the Warmest Color” (“La Vie d’Adèle Chapitres 1 et 2”) could fill pages. Directed by Abdellatif Kechiche and based on Julie Maroh’s graphic novel “Blue Angel,” the movie was one of the more hotly anticipated competition titles in more than one sense. Before the screening, word swirled that it featured a 20-minute lesbian sex scene and one male critic overshared, if in more colorful language, that he had been told it was an onanistic fete. More pragmatically, this wildly undisciplined, overlong 2-hour, 59-minute drama tracks the sentimental education of its heroine, Adèle (Adèle Exarchopoulos), from 15 through her 20s and her life-changing love for another woman, Emma (Léa Seydoux).

 

The two meet by chance, first passing each other in the street — the effect Emma has on Adèle, then a high-school junior, is electric — and then in a bar. Although Emma has a lover, who conveniently disappears, she and Adèle become lovers. An hour and a half after the start, the two are tumbling in bed and while I didn’t clock their initial encounter, it goes on so long that a male friend jokingly complained about glancing at his watch.

 

In this scene, as throughout, Mr. Kechiche and his hand-held camera keep close tabs on Adèle. This intimacy is clearly meant to draw you into her consciousness. Yet, as the camera hovers over her open mouth and splayed body, even while she sleeps with her derrière prettily framed, the movie feels far more about Mr. Kechiche’s desires than anything else.

 

It’s disappointing that Mr. Kechiche, whose movies include “The Secret of the Grain” and “Black Venus” (another voyeuristic exercise), seems so unaware or maybe just uninterested in the tough questions about the representation of the female body that feminists have engaged for decades. However sympathetic are the characters and Ms. Exarchopoulos, who produces prodigious amounts of tears and phlegm along with some poignant moments, Mr. Kechiche registers as oblivious to real women. He’s as bad as the male character who prattles on about “mystical” female orgasms and art without evident awareness of the barriers female artists faced or why those barriers might help explain the kind of art, including centuries of writhing female nudes, that was produced.

 

“Men look at women,” the art critic John Berger observed in 1972. “Women watch themselves being looked at.” Plus ça change….

 

Cannes 2013: Blue Is the Warmest Colour (La Vie D’Adèle Chapitre 1 et 2) – first look review

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/may/23/cannes-2013-blue-warmest-colour-review

 

There’s a devastating mix of eroticism and sadness in Abdellatif Kechiche’s new film, which returns to the style and setting of his 2003 movie Games Of Love and Chance. It’s the epic but intimate story of a love affair between two young women, unfolding in what seems like real time. There’s an interestingly open, almost unfinished quality to the narrative, although this could just be because the print shown here in Cannes was still without credits. The film is acted with honesty and power by Léa Seydoux and Adèle Exarchopoulos; the affair itself is a little idealised, and the film is flawed by one rather histrionic scene, though not, I think, by its expansive three-hour length. Nonetheless, this is still a blazingly emotional and explosively sexy film, which reminds you how timidly unsexy most films are, although as with all explicit movies, there will be one or two airy sophisticates who will affect to be unmoved by it, and claim that the sex is “boring”. It isn’t.

 

The movie is based on a French graphic novel, Le Bleu Est Une Couleur Chaude, by Julie Maroh, although the film had for me something of an early fiction by Alan Hollinghurst, like The Spell. Adèle (Exarchopoulos) is a 17-year-old at high school in Lille, a bright, idealistic student who loves studying literature, both English and French, and wants to be a teacher. (She will incidentally reveal later that she loves American movies by people like Scorsese and Kubrick – though it is Altman who is more of an influence on this expansive, garrulous film.) After a painful breakup with a boyfriend, Adèle goes with a gay friend to a bar, and sees a beautiful young woman with short hair, dyed blue, whom she has noticed before in the street: it is Emma (Séydoux), an art student.

 

Soon they begin a paint-blisteringly intense affair. Emma’s blue hairstyle means that the colour blue – a cleverly returning motif – becomes the colour of happiness. But as the couple grow up and grow apart, Emma lets the blue-dye job grow out and she reverts to her natural blonde colour. It is a bad sign: the beginning of the end.

 

The extended sex scenes have an explicitness and candour which can only be called magnificent; in fact they make the sex in famous movies like, say, Last Tango in Paris look supercilious and dated. (And it also rather exposes the confection of François Ozon’s Jeune et Jolie earlier in the competition.) There is something coolly, thrillingly uncompromising about the first sex scene especially, and also something quietly and inexplicably moving when Kechiche finally cuts from the end of that sequence to the crowd scene at a gay pride rally.

 

Food is an interesting motif as well. Emma introduces Adèle to her liberal and tolerant mother and stepfather over dinner; they are entirely aware of Emma’s sexuality and serve Adèle a sophisticated novelty – oysters. (A hint of Kubrick here? Olivier’s “oysters” speech from Spartacus?) When Emma comes back to meet Adèle’s conservative folks, however, the lovers have to stay in the closet and pretend Emma has a boyfriend. They get served some humbler fare: spaghetti bolognaise. Yet is precisely this kind of food that Adèle serves up at the party for Emma’s first art exhibition, cementing her submissive and domestic position in the relationship.

 

The darker phase of their relationship (presumably the second “chapter” of the title) is painful and there is ultimately much crying, and this looks every bit as passionate and real and un-Hollywood as the sex. I can’t imagine Jessica Chastain or Anne Hathaway ever doing the brutally authentic tears-mingling-with-snot look the way Adèle Exarchopoulos does it.

 

It’s a long movie, and by the end you may well feel every bit as wrung out as the characters. But it is genuinely passionate film-making.

 

SHOULD WE SUPPORT ‘BLUE IS THE WARMEST COLOR’? THE TOUGHEST ETHICAL DILEMMA OF FALL 2013

http://www.hollywood.com/news/movies/55034261/blue-is-the-warmest-color-controversy?page=all

 

Hollywood is no stranger to allegedly unethical productions that earn esteem as classics (think of Apocalypse Now), but usually controversy arises after a film has been released. Only a rarefied few have seen Blue as of yet, and while their reviews are effusive, the behind the scenes drama seems to qualify these accolades a bit. It becomes troublesome to compliment the candor of the film’s NC-17 worthy sex scenes if the actresses felt pressured to perform them or uncomfortable with how much they revealed. Likewise, the lengthy running time reflects just how many hours — potentially unpaid hours — crew members spent working on the set.

 

The film is ineligible for the Foreign Film Oscar this year, but, like last year’s Amour, has the chance to compete among the English language films. Surely some voters who know about the controversy will hesitate before nominating Kechiche for Best Director. Regardless of what happened, pushing actors and crew members to the point of emotional distress is not the way to run a movie set. It remains to be seen what actually happened, but it doesn’t sound like things will be settled any time soon. And until then, it’s a tough choice — support a potentially unethical director or miss out on what sounds like one of the best films of the year.

 

Blue Is the Warmest Color: Cannes Review

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie/blue-is-warmest-color/review/527347

Loosely adapted by Kechiche and Ghalia Lacroix from the prize-winning Gallic graphic novel by Julie Maroh, the script is separated into two sections (the “chapters” of the French title) spanning a decade in the life of high school student Adele (Exarchopoulos), who lives in a blue-collar home in the northern city of Lille. We’re first introduced to her in class — in a scene reminiscent of Games — during a lecture on Pierre de Marivaux’s novel La Vie de Marianne, for which the teacher wonders aloud: “How do you understand that the heart is missing something?”

That’s the question the film tries to answer throughout its long and winding narrative, as we follow Adele during her first, unsuccessful relationship with a charming fellow student, Thomas (Jeremie Laheurte), and then, into the embraces of the mysterious, blue-haired art school chick Emma (Seydoux), whom she connects with in a lesbian bar after having seen her earlier on. As it soon becomes clear, whatever Adele’s heart was lacking with Thomas is soon enough filled by her burgeoning affair with Emma, and despite suffering the wrath of her gay-bashing buddies, she’s clearly hooked from the start.

And it’s easy to see why. Because once the two girls get into bed together, they forge a sexual bond that Kechiche captures in ways few directors have done before him, allowing their lovemaking to play out in extended takes that definitely cross the barrier between performance and the real deal. Yet, the bedroom scenes are a far cry from softcore porn or art-house exploitation: what they show — amid various positions, moaning and exposed flesh (not to mention suggestive oyster slurping, in one playful sequence) — is that sex and love can, in the best cases, become one and the same, uniting two people who might actually have less in common than they believe.

Such contrasts are explored in the film’s second half, which picks up after Adele and Emma have moved in together, with the former working as a kindergarten teacher and the latter pursuing her career as a painter. Having already hinted at the girls’ class differences during two family dinner scenes, Kechiche begins revealing how their disparate personalities and backgrounds, especially when it comes to art and culture, are gradually driving them apart — a reality that comes to the forefront at a party where Adele appears as the apron-wearing housewife among Emma’s friends.

It’s a compelling way to shift the story’s focus from issues of gender and sexual identity to questions of social belonging, and Blue winds up going beyond the original comic book to provide a sharp commentary on how couples struggle, and don’t always manage, to overcome their innate differences, even if the sex is still really, really good. And so when things eventually explode between the two lovebirds and Adele faces an arduous chagrin d’amour in all her blubbering, snot-dripping glory, Kechiche brings us back to the question posed by Marivaux, answering it in a way that’s utterly convincing.

Less concerned with classic storytelling than with creating virtual performance pieces on screen, the film features dozens of extended sequences of Adele and Emma both in and out of bed—scenes that are virtuously acted and directed, even if they run on for longer than most filmmakers would allow. But such a technique is precisely why Kechiche belongs in the same camp as John Cassavetes or Maurice Pialat, eschewing narrative concision in favor of the messy realities of life, and creating works that can be as ambitiously bloated as they are emotionally jarring.

Despite some of the longueurs, the central turn from 19-year-old Exarchopoulos (Carre blanc), who DP Sofian El Fani captures in every state possible, manages to hold it all together, and the actress can really make you feel things only suggested at in other movies, especially when it comes to the ecstasy and agony of a first relationship. Playing opposite her, Seydoux (also in Cannes film Grand Central) shows how much she’s matured from a gorgeous It-girl to a daring young talent, and this is clearly some of the best work in her short career.

With four credited editors (including co-writer Lacroix) shaping all the footage into a workable whole, the pacing and performances never slow down despite the running time, while the story feels like it could just keep going. Perhaps this is what Kechiche intended with his open-ended French title, although, as the film’s moving final sequence suggests, this chapter in Adele’s life has definitely closed.

Tyler Oakley VRP

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyler_Oakley

 

Born                 March 22, 1989 (age 24)

Michigan, U.S.

Nationality     American

Occupation     Internet personality

Years active   2007–present

Height             5 ft 5 in

 

Tyler Oakley is an American vlogger and advocate for gay youth, presenting on topics such as queer politics and pop culture.

 

Oakley began making videos in 2007; his first video has received over 108,000 views on YouTube. Since uploading his first video while a freshman at Michigan State University, he has received over 86,000,000 video views and gained over 2,400,000 subscribers along with over 200 videos posted. He is a former member of the successful collaboration channel “5AwesomeGays,” where he produced the Friday video for over 3 years. Currently, he is described as having “one of the loudest voices on YouTube,” and Bloomberg defines him as a “YouTube sensation.”

 

Since March 2013, he co-hosts a weekly pop-culture news update, “Top That!” with Becca Frucht for PopSugar. He posts regularly on several social networking sites, including: Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, and Instagram.

 

Oakley supports The Trevor Project, an organization for the prevention of suicide in LGBTQ youth. He has interned with them, hosted a red carpet event and raised over $25,000 in support of their work. He has also interned at Bowery. Other ventures include: working as a resident mentor; teacher’s assistant; product marketer/developer at Michigan State University; social media and communication manager at Chictopia; and director of social media at Good Ideas for Good Causes.

 

A self-proclaimed “professional fangirl,” Oakley is a fan of Darren Criss and the British-Irish boy band One Direction.

 

YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/tyleroakley/videos

Twitter: https://twitter.com/tyleroakley (1,467,000 followers)

Tumblr: http://tyleroakley.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thetyleroakley (537K likes)

Instagram: http://instagram.com/tyleroakley# (1,093,000 followers)

 

In the media:

 

Tyler Oakley Is A Bigger Fangirl Than You (VIDEO)

02/02/2013 | Huffpost Teen

 

Rising star Tyler Oakley may have one of the loudest voices on YouTube these days.

A self-proclaimed “fangirl,” Oakley’s humor, talent, and devotion to pop culture have captured the hearts of over half a million followers on YouTube, Tumblr, and Twitter. Oakley is rapidly ascending to the status of vlogger elite, frequently doing guest appearances on YouTube’s “What’s Trending,” hosting red carpet events, and hanging out with the likes of Lady Gaga, Perez Hilton, and YouTube’s own Kingsley. (The ship name, by the way, is Tingsley.)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/02/tyler-oakley-is-a-bigger-_n_2599750.html

 

Young YouTube Partners: Finding Success as Entrepreneurs and Internet Stars

12/31/2012 | HUFFPOT College

 

Tyler believes that it is very difficult if someone defines success by the standard of being able to make YouTube your full time career. He believes it is easier to define success if you’re using your channel as a forum rather than a career. “If you define success as finding a creative outlet for you to express yourself, then it’s a place where anybody can be successful,” he says. “My idea of success is being able to connect with people and hopefully entertain and inspire and have fun just with myself.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alfonso-espina/young-youtube-partners-fi_b_2324241.html

 

 

Tyler Oakley tells TCU audience how YouTube brought hate but also inspired him to fight it

05 Mar 2012 | dallasvoice.com

 

California YouTube sensation Tyler Oakley shared his story of how video stardom led to his first experience of anti-gay hatred — and how he used the hatred to encourage others, on Saturday at the TCU Southwestern LGBT Leadership Conference.

http://www.dallasvoice.com/lgbt-activist-shares-youtube-brought-hate-inspired-speak-10103306.html

 

Hubbub Over Hillary Clinton Movies: A Dress Rehearsal For 2016

Hubbub Over Hillary Clinton Movies: A Dress Rehearsal For 2016

NPR | by Fank James

August 07, 2013

Commotion over a pair of movies that haven’t even been made proves, if anything, that the Clintons need not lift a finger to inspire a controversy.

That said, the hubbub over a planned CNN documentary and a proposed NBC Entertainment miniseries on Hillary Clinton, the former first lady and secretary of state, does feel somewhat premature. Clinton hasn’t said whether she intends to run for president in 2016.

But it’s never too early to take a Democratic Party titan down a few pegs, especially one who polls well ahead of all Republican presidential possibilities.

That’s one way to read the from Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, who told CNN and NBC they have until Aug. 14 to decide against running what he has called “puff pieces” meant to put wind in Clinton’s political sails. If not, Priebus says, he’ll ask the RNC to vote to ban NBC and CNN from holding 2016 GOP primary debates and will push to hurt their chances of hosting actual presidential debates.

Another way to read the RNC threat is as a chance to rev up the conservative base for fundraising purposes.

And some have read it as Priebus wanting to reduce the number of Republican primary debates from 2012’s cavalcade of two dozen to something more manageable. He may be secretly hoping that CNN and NBC will move ahead with the projects, the theory goes, thus cutting down on outlets to host debates.

Asked about this in a , Priebus said his real concern was the promotion of a Clinton candidacy.

David Brock, the one-time conservative anti-Clintonite who underwent a conversion and started the progressive Media Matters for America, agrees with Priebus that the projects raise fairness questions.

Brock to NBC Entertainment and CNN officials asking them to reconsider. New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd that Priebus “has a point.” Leo Hindery, a Democratic political activist and businessman, has also agreed with Priebus, saying on Bloomberg News’ “Street Smart” program: “It is to do this.”

Both CNN and NBC have politely suggested that their critics may be jumping the gun. CNN asked Priebus and the RNC in to “reserve judgment” on the documentary; NBC gave the Hollywood Reporter a statement, saying, “it would be premature to make any statements or draw any conclusions at this time” about the miniseries.

While it might be worth waiting for the films to actually be made before declaring that they would benefit Clinton, criticism could influence the filmmakers to err on the side of more negativity. So it could be a smart move all the way around for Priebus.

Both movies reportedly would air next year, well before the 2016 presidential race. Timing is important because of the federal equal-time rule, which requires that if a broadcast or cable outlet shows a documentary featuring a legally qualified candidate once the campaign for an office is officially underway, it must give equal time to other candidates for that office.

And regardless of timing, the fictional mini-series, unlike the documentary, wouldn’t trigger the equal-time law unless the real Clinton popped up somewhere in it, like in a cameo, according to an FCC official, who spoke on condition that his name not be used.

While it seems unlikely that Clinton would pop up in the fictional mini-series, what does seem likely is that the current controversy is just a dress rehearsal for many to come if she decides to seek the presidency.

RNC’s Hillary Clinton Movie Threat Leads To Strange Political Alliances

The Huffington Post  |  By

08/07/2013 2:21 pm EDT

When was the last time an issue found Media Matters agreeing with the Republican National Committee, and the New York Post backing the so-called “liberal media”?

That’s exactly what’s happened thanks to the RNC’s threat to ban CNN and NBC from hosting any Republican debates unless they drop plans to make a documentary and a mini-series about Hillary Clinton.

RNC chair Reince Priebus blasted the programs as clear signs of political bias in favor of Clinton, and an unacceptable intrusion by the networks into the electoral process.

The different responses to his move saw some strange political bedfellows pop up.

Media Matters chair David Brock, for instance, sent a letter to NBC and CNN siding with Priebus, though for different reasons. Brock wrote that the timing of the programs “raises too many questions about fairness and conflicts of interest ahead of the 2016 election.”

He added, “Is your network also prepared to respond to criticism it is not being fair to other potential candidates? How will your network respond to the right-wing noise machine that is already pressuring you to adopt its ideological lens on Clinton?”

Joining Brock was New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, who wrote a piece called “Reince Is Right.” Though she said Priebus was “goofy” to try to ban the films, she wrote that he was right to be worried about them:

Films can dramatically alter the way famous people are viewed, making them cooler, more glamorous, more sympathetic — and the reverse. Clever filmmakers can offer up delicious soufflés of propaganda and storytelling, putting a new imprint on the historical record.